AI Trained on Open Source Should Be Open Source Too
We trained these models on decades of open source code that developers shared freely, then locked the output behind proprietary APIs. That doesn't sit right with me. Since RMS announced the GNU Project in 1983, programmers have released millions of lines of code under licenses that asked for attribution and sharing. GitHub and the rest of the internet scraped it all anyway. No permission, no credit, no license compliance. Just training data. Now when you ask an AI assistant to write a function, the result comes out copyrighted by the company that owns the model, not by you, and definitely not open source. I think that's legally wrong. My take is that purely AI-generated code shouldn't be copyrightable at all. The monkey selfie case established that only humans can hold copyright, and a model isn't a person. If the code came out of a system trained on the commons, it should belong to the commons. But here's where it gets messy. Even if you accept that argum...